# Equity Research Interview Questions

Below are real examples of the most common questions (and answers) used to hire equity research analysts and associates at banks.

Below are real examples of the most common questions (and answers) used to hire equity research analysts and associates at banks.

Based on our first hand experience, as well discussions with equity research professionals, we’ve compiled a list of the top questions to be asked by a research analyst when interviewing an associate. We’ve also added what we think are the best answers to these challenging interview questions. For even more research, check out this explanation on equity research vs. investment banking.

These are all variants on the same question – pitch me a stock. Be prepared to pitch 3 or 4 stocks. For example, a large cap stock, a small cap stock, and a stock that you would short. For any company you are going to pitch make sure that you have read a few analyst reports and know key information about the company. You must know basic valuation metrics (EV/EBITDA multiples, PE multiples, etc.), key operation statistics, and the names of key members of the management team (e.g. CEO). You also must have at least three key points to support your argument.

The most common valuation methods are DCF valuation methods and relative valuation methods using comparable public companies (“Comps”) and precedent transactions (“Precedents”).

It can also be shown that the PE multiple is driven by (1 – g/ROE) / (r – g) where r is the cost of equity, g is the growth rate, and ROE is return on equity. A high tech company may have a higher PE because growth expectations for the stock are higher.

The PB multiple can be shown to be PE x ROE. It is therefore driven by return on equity and the drivers of the PE multiple. It can also be shown that the PE multiple is driven by (1 – g/ROE) / (r – g) where r is the cost of equity, g is the growth rate, and ROE is return on equity.

Since the PB multiple is PE x ROE, this means the PB multiple is ( ROE – g ) / (r – g). If we assume a zero growth rate, the equation implies that the market value of equity should be equal to the book value of equity if ROE = r. The PB multiple will be higher than 1 if a company delivers ROE higher than the cost of equity (r).

This relationship implies a significant difference between the firm’s enterprise value and its equity value. The difference between the two is “net debt”. As a result, a company with a significant amount of net debt will likely have a higher EV/EBITDA multiple.

Beta is a measure of market (systematic) risk. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) to determine a cost of equity. Beta measures a stocks’ volatility of returns, relative to an index. So a beta of 1 has the same volatility of returns as the index, and 1 is more volatile.

When you look up beta on Bloomberg, it’s levered to reflect the debt of each company. But each company’s capital structure is different and we want to look at how “risky” a company is regardless of what percentage of debt or equity it has. To get that, we need to unlever beta each time. You look up the beta for a group of comparable companies, un-lever each one, take the median of the set and then lever it based on your company’s capital structure. Then you use this Levered Beta in the Cost of Equity calculation. For your reference, the formulas for un-levering and re-levering Beta are below:

Un-Levered Beta = Levered Beta / (1 + ((1 – Tax Rate) x (Total Debt/Equity)))

Levered Beta = Un-Levered Beta x (1 + ((1 – Tax Rate) x (Total Debt/Equity)))

Enterprise value is the value of the company that is attributable to all investors. Equity value only represents the portion of the company belonging to shareholders. Enterprise value incorporates the market value of the equity plus the market value of net debt (as well as other sources of funding if used such as preferred shares, minority interests, etc.)

Technically yes. Enterprise value is the sum of the market value of equity and net debt (gross debt less cash). If a company has no interest bearing debt but does have cash it will lead to a situation where the equity value is greater than the enterprise value.

- DCF valuation methods
- Relative valuation methods – using comparable public companies and precedent transactions
- Break-up valuation methods – looking at the liquidation or break-up value of the business
- Real options valuation methods – more rare
- Here is an overview of all valuation methods

You would not use a DCF valuation methodology when a company does not have forecastable cash flows. An example of this would be a start-up company.

EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, PE, and PB.

EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization on the basis that they are “non-cash items.” However, depreciation and amortization also are a measure of what the company is or needs to spend on capital expenditure. Warren Buffett is credited as having said “Does management think the tooth fairy pays for capital expenditures?” Here is an article on why Buffett does not like EBITDA.

First you need to project the prices of commodities and the company’s reserves.Rather than a standard DCF, you use a Net Asset Value (NAV) model.The NAV model is similar but everything flows from the company’s reserves rather than a simple revenue growth / EBITDA margin projection.You also look at industry specific multiples such as P / NAV in addition to the standard multiples. Here are more mining valuation methods.

The forecast period is driven by the ability to reasonably predict the future. Less than 5 years is often too short to be useful. More than 10 years becomes difficult to forecast reliably.

If you are forecasting free cash flows to the firm, you normally use the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) as the discount rate. If you are forecasting free cash flows to equity, you use the cost of equity.

Terminal values either use an exit multiple or the Gordon Growth (growing perpetuity) method.

With standard DCF, there is an assumption that all cash flows occur at the end of the year. The mid-year convention adjusts for this distortion by making the assumption that all cash flows come mid-way through the year. Instead of using discount periods of 1 for the first year, 2 for the second year, etc. in the DCF formula, we use 0.5 for the first year, 1.5 for the second year, and so on. For training on financial modeling click here.

If you want more practice, take a look at our other interview guides and interactive career map to advance your finance career.