Learn 100% online from anywhere in the world. Enroll today!

Dividend Irrelevance Theory

Financial theory that claims that issuing dividends does not increase a company’s potential profitability or its stock price

What is the Dividend Irrelevance Theory?

Dividend Irrelevance Theory is a financial theory that claims that the issuing of dividends does not increase a company’s potential profitability or its stock price. It suggests that investors are not better off owning shares of companies that issue dividends than shares of those that do not.

 

Dividend Irrelevance Theory

 

Summary

  • The dividend irrelevance theory suggests that issuing dividends does not increase the profitability or stock price of a company.
  • To investors, whether a company issues shares or not does not mathematically affect personal wealth; only the form of the wealth is changed.
  • Investors may behave irrationally, which can create an implicit demand for a dividend-issuing company’s shares. However, the demand does not reflect the company’s profitability.

 

Stock Price and Company Profitability

As investors buy stocks of a company in hopes of earning profits, stock prices show how profitable investors believe a company will be.

Many internal and external factors affect a company’s stock price. They include:

  • Change in management
  • Employee layoffs
  • New government regulations
  • Global pandemics
  • Economic trends
  • Public relations/consumer views of the company

Some investors believe that issuing dividends increases a company’s share price. However, the dividend irrelevance theory suggests that it is not true.

 

Dividends and Their Relationship with Profitability

 

1. Dividends are a cost to a company and do not increase stock price

Conceptually, dividends are irrelevant to the value of a company because paying dividends does not increase a company’s ability to create profit.

When a company creates profit, it obtains more money to reinvest in itself. It can signal to investors that the company now possesses more capital/capability to create more profit and lead to an increase in the company stock price.

However, if the company issues dividends, the company gives money to shareholders that could’ve been reinvested into itself and thereby loses some potential in its profitability.

Implicitly, the company incurs a “cost” by issuing dividends.

 

2. Equivalence of issuing and not issuing dividends

Logically, the loss of potential profitability by issuing dividends is equal to the total amount of dividends paid out. Then, the share price of the company will decrease by the amount of the dividend issued.

From the perspective of an investor, issuing dividends doesn’t affect personal wealth.

If the company in which we hold stock issues dividends, an investor’s on-hand cash increases by the amount of the dividend, but the stocks the investor holds are now valued less by the amount of the dividends issued, effectively giving a net gain of $0.

 

Numerical Example

Let there be two identical companies, Company A and Company B. The only difference between them is that Company A issues dividends, and Company B does not.

Each company starts off with a stock price of $10 and one investor, Anne, holds 100 shares of Company A, while another investor, Bill, holds 100 shares of Company B.

The investors’ total wealth profiles are as follows:

 

Example - Individual Wealth Profile

 

Say the two companies perform equally well, and both companies’ share prices increase by $2 and become $12 per share. Anne’s and Bill’s stocks rise in value to $1200.

 

New Stock Values

 

Now, Company A issues a dividend of $1 per share, whereas Company B does not issue dividends.

With the issue of dividends, Company A’s share price lowers, by the amount of dividend issued, to $11 per share.

With 100 shares, Anne receives a payment of $100.

 

Example - FInal Values

 

It is clear that Anne’s total wealth from Company A is $1200 ($1100 in stocks and $100 received in dividends), and Bill’s total wealth from Company A is also $1200 ($1200 all in the form of stocks).

Note that, if Bill needs cash on hand, he can opt to sell eight shares (at $12 per share) of Company B to liquidate $96 worth of stocks. Thus, from the investor’s perspective, there is no difference whether or not a company issues dividends.

 

Caveats

 

1. Investors seeking dividend issuing stocks

Because some investors may wish to receive cash rather than to hold shares (possibly due to a feeling of security from cash), there can be an intrinsic demand for stocks of such companies.

However, the demand does not reflect potential profitability. It simply shows that certain investors are predisposed to buy dividend-paying stocks for reasons unrelated to rigorous financial analysis.

 

2. Continuous dividends may lower future stock price

Commitments to paying large dividends in the long term may decrease the potential profitability of a company. As a company continuously issues large dividends, it implicitly loses funds to create future profits.

Over time, dividends issued can add up, and the loss of a large sum of operational cash can compel the company to take on debt or be unable to implement a profitable strategy.

In turn, high proportions of corporate debt or failure to implement a good strategy when opportune can lower investor confidence, which then leads to lower share prices and ultimately decreases company profitability.

 

Additional Resources

CFI offers the Certified Banking & Credit Analyst (CBCA)™ certification program for those looking to take their careers to the next level. To keep learning and advancing your career, the following resources will be helpful:

  • Liquidating Dividend
  • Dividend Growth Rate
  • Stock Price
  • Profitability Index

Financial Analyst Training

Get world-class financial training with CFI’s online certified financial analyst training program!

Gain the confidence you need to move up the ladder in a high powered corporate finance career path.

 

Learn financial modeling and valuation in Excel the easy way, with step-by-step training.