What is the Fraud Triangle?
The fraud triangle is a framework commonly used in auditing to explain the motivation behind an individual’s decision to commit fraud. The fraud triangle outlines three components that contribute to increasing the risk of fraud: (1) opportunity, (2) incentive, and (3) rationalization.
- The fraud triangle is a framework used to explain the motivation behind an individual’s decision to commit fraud.
- The fraud triangle consists of three components: (1) Opportunity, (2) Incentive, and (3) Rationalization.
- Fraud refers to the deception that is intentional and caused by an employee or organization for personal gain.
What is Fraud?
The fraud triangle is used to explain the motivation behind a fraud. However, what exactly is fraud?
Fraud refers to a deception that is intentional and caused by an employee or organization for personal gain. In other words, fraud is a deceitful activity used to gain an advantage or generate an illegal profit. In addition, the illegal act benefits the perpetrator and harms other parties involved.
For example, an employee that pockets cash from the company’s register is committing fraud. The employee would benefit from getting additional cash at the expense of the company.
Below, we discuss the components in the fraud triangle that contribute to increasing the risk of fraud.
The Fraud Triangle – Opportunity
Opportunity refers to circumstances that allow fraud to occur. In the fraud triangle, it is the only component that a company exercises complete control over. Examples that provide opportunities for committing fraud include:
1. Weak internal controls
Internal controls are processes and procedures implemented to ensure the integrity of accounting and financial information. Weak internal controls such as poor separation of duties, lack of supervision, and poor documentation processes give rise to opportunities for fraud.
2. Poor tone at the top
Tone at the top refers to upper management and board of directors’ commitment towards being ethical, showing integrity, and being honest. A poor tone at the top results in a company that is more susceptible to fraud.
3. Inadequate accounting policies
Accounting policies refer to how items on the financial statements are recorded. Poor (inadequate) accounting policies may provide an opportunity for employees to manipulate numbers.
Incentive, alternatively called pressure, refers to an employee’s mindset towards committing fraud. Examples of things that provide incentives for committing fraud include:
1. Bonuses based on a financial metric
Common financial metrics used to assess the performance of an employee are revenues and net income. Bonuses that are based on a financial metric creates pressure for employees to meet targets which, in turn, may cause them to commit fraud to achieve the objective.
2. Investor and analyst expectations
The need to meet or exceed investor and analyst expectations can create pressure to commit fraud.
3. Personal incentives
Personal incentives may include wanting to earn more money, the need to pay personal bills, a gambling addiction, etc.
The Fraud Triangle – Rationalization
Rationalization refers to an individual’s justification for committing fraud. Examples of common rationalizations that fraud committers use include:
1. “They treated me wrong”
An individual may be spiteful towards their manager or employer and believe that committing fraud is a way of getting payback.
2. “Upper management is doing it as well”
A poor tone at the top may cause an individual to follow in the footsteps of those higher in the corporate hierarchy.
3. “There is no other solution”
An individual may believe that they might lose everything (for example, losing a job) unless he or she commits fraud.
CFI offers the Financial Modeling & Valuation Analyst (FMVA)™ certification program for those looking to take their careers to the next level. To keep learning and developing your knowledge base, please explore the additional relevant CFI resources below: