Financial theory that claims that issuing dividends does not increase a company’s potential profitability or its stock price
Over 1.8 million professionals use CFI to learn accounting, financial analysis, modeling and more. Start with a free account to explore 20+ always-free courses and hundreds of finance templates and cheat sheets.
Dividend Irrelevance Theory is a financial theory that claims that the issuing of dividends does not increase a company’s potential profitability or its stock price. It suggests that investors are not better off owning shares of companies that issue dividends than shares of those that do not.
The dividend irrelevance theory suggests that issuing dividends does not increase the profitability or stock price of a company.
To investors, whether a company issues shares or not does not mathematically affect personal wealth; only the form of the wealth is changed.
Investors may behave irrationally, which can create an implicit demand for a dividend-issuing company’s shares. However, the demand does not reflect the company’s profitability.
Stock Price and Company Profitability
As investors buy stocks of a company in hopes of earning profits, stock prices show how profitable investors believe a company will be.
Many internal and external factors affect a company’s stock price. They include:
Some investors believe that issuing dividends increases a company’s share price. However, the dividend irrelevance theory suggests that it is not true.
Dividends and Their Relationship with Profitability
1. Dividends are a cost to a company and do not increase stock price
Conceptually, dividends are irrelevant to the value of a company because paying dividends does not increase a company’s ability to create profit.
When a company creates profit, it obtains more money to reinvest in itself. It can signal to investors that the company now possesses more capital/capability to create more profit and lead to an increase in the company stock price.
However, if the company issues dividends, the company gives money to shareholders that could’ve been reinvested into itself and thereby loses some potential in its profitability.
Implicitly, the company incurs a “cost” by issuing dividends.
2. Equivalence of issuing and not issuing dividends
Logically, the loss of potential profitability by issuing dividends is equal to the total amount of dividends paid out. Then, the share price of the company will decrease by the amount of the dividend issued.
From the perspective of an investor, issuing dividends doesn’t affect personal wealth.
If the company in which we hold stock issues dividends, an investor’s on-hand cash increases by the amount of the dividend, but the stocks the investor holds are now valued less by the amount of the dividends issued, effectively giving a net gain of $0.
Let there be two identical companies, Company A and Company B. The only difference between them is that Company A issues dividends, and Company B does not.
Each company starts off with a stock price of $10 and one investor, Anne, holds 100 shares of Company A, while another investor, Bill, holds 100 shares of Company B.
The investors’ total wealth profiles are as follows:
Say the two companies perform equally well, and both companies’ share prices increase by $2 and become $12 per share. Anne’s and Bill’s stocks rise in value to $1200.
Now, Company A issues a dividend of $1 per share, whereas Company B does not issue dividends.
With the issue of dividends, Company A’s share price lowers, by the amount of dividend issued, to $11 per share.
With 100 shares, Anne receives a payment of $100.
It is clear that Anne’s total wealth from Company A is $1200 ($1100 in stocks and $100 received in dividends), and Bill’s total wealth from Company A is also $1200 ($1200 all in the form of stocks).
Note that, if Bill needs cash on hand, he can opt to sell eight shares (at $12 per share) of Company B to liquidate $96 worth of stocks. Thus, from the investor’s perspective, there is no difference whether or not a company issues dividends.
1. Investors seeking dividend issuing stocks
Because some investors may wish to receive cash rather than to hold shares (possibly due to a feeling of security from cash), there can be an intrinsic demand for stocks of such companies.
However, the demand does not reflect potential profitability. It simply shows that certain investors are predisposed to buy dividend-paying stocks for reasons unrelated to rigorous financial analysis.
2. Continuous dividends may lower future stock price
Commitments to paying large dividends in the long term may decrease the potential profitability of a company. As a company continuously issues large dividends, it implicitly loses funds to create future profits.
Over time, dividends issued can add up, and the loss of a large sum of operational cash can compel the company to take on debt or be unable to implement a profitable strategy.
In turn, high proportions of corporate debt or failure to implement a good strategy when opportune can lower investor confidence, which then leads to lower share prices and ultimately decreases company profitability.
CFI offers the Commercial Banking & Credit Analyst (CBCA)™ certification program for those looking to take their careers to the next level. To keep learning and advancing your career, the following resources will be helpful:
Take your learning and productivity to the next level with our Premium Templates.
Upgrading to a paid membership gives you access to our extensive collection of plug-and-play Templates designed to power your performance—as well as CFI's full course catalog and accredited Certification Programs.
Already have a Self-Study or Full-Immersion membership? Log in
Access Exclusive Templates
Gain unlimited access to more than 250 productivity Templates, CFI's full course catalog and accredited Certification Programs, hundreds of resources, expert reviews and support, the chance to work with real-world finance and research tools, and more.