Tariff imposed on imported goods that are priced below the fair market value of similar goods in the domestic market
Over 1.8 million professionals use CFI to learn accounting, financial analysis, modeling and more. Start with a free account to explore 20+ always-free courses and hundreds of finance templates and cheat sheets.
Anti-dumping duty is a tariff imposed on imports manufactured in foreign countries that are priced below the fair market value of similar goods in the domestic market. The government imposes anti-dumping duty on foreign imports when it believes that the goods are being “dumped” – through the low pricing – in the domestic market. Anti-dumping duty is imposed to protect local businesses and markets from unfair competition by foreign imports.
The duty is priced in an amount that equals the difference between the normal costs of the products in the importing country and the market value of similar goods in the exporting country or other countries that produce similar products. The anti-dumping duty can be anywhere from 0% up to 550% of the invoice value of the goods.
Role of the WTO in Regulating Anti-Dumping Measures
The World Trade Organization (WTO) plays a critical role in the regulation of anti-dumping measures. As an international organization, the WTO does not regulate firms accused of engaging in dumping activities, but it possesses the power to regulate how governments react to dumping activities in their territories.
Some government sometimes react harshly to foreign companies engaging in dumping activities by introducing punitive anti-dumping duties on foreign imports, and the WTO may come in to determine if the actions are genuine, or if they go against the WTO free-market principle.
According to the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement, dumping is legal unless it threatens to cause material injury in the importing country domestic market. Also, the organization prohibits dumping when the action causes material retardation in the domestic market.
Where dumping occurs, the WTO allows the government of the affected country to take legal action against the dumping country as long as there is evidence of genuine material injury to industries in the domestic market. The government must show that dumping took place, the extent of the dumping in terms of costs, and the injury or threat to cause injury to the domestic market.
Calculating the Anti-Dumping Duty
The WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement allows governments to act in a way that does not discriminate between trading partners and honors the DATT 1994 principle when calculating the duty. The GATT 1994 principle provides a number of guidelines to govern trade between members of the WTO. It requires that imported goods not to be subjected to internal taxes in excess of the costs imposed on domestic goods.
Also, it requires that imported goods be treated the same way as domestic goods under domestic laws and regulations. However, it allows the government to impose a duty on foreign imports if they exceed the bound rates and threaten to cause injury to the domestic market.
There are several ways of determining whether an imported product has been dumped lightly or heavily, and the amount of duty to be applied. The first method is to calculate the anti-dumping duty based on the normal price of the product.
The second alternative is to use the price charged on the same product but in a different country. The last alternative is to calculate the duty based on the total product costs, expenses, and the manufacturer’s profit margins.
Examples of Dumping Cases in the United States
Recently, there’s been an increase in the number of anti-dumping cases initiated by American businesses. Local businesses rely on anti-dumping laws to limit unfair competition from below-market-value imports manufactured abroad. The International Trade Commission (ITC) imposes the anti-dumping duties based on the recommendations of the U.S. Department of Commerce.
1. Flat Panel Display Screens Dumping by Japanese Companies in 1991
Following complaints by American businesses on the dumping of flat panel display (FPD) screens by Japanese companies, the Commerce Department ruled that Japanese companies were liable for the dumping of the FPD screens in the U.S. market. Consequently, the ITC initiated an investigation in early 1991, and the agency found that Japanese companies dumped FPD screens, causing material damage to American businesses. The ITC recommended a 62.5% anti-dumping duty on FPD screens imported from Japan.
2. Dumping of Steel by Chinese Companies in 2015
Large American steel producers filed complaints with the U.S. Department of Commerce on the dumping of steel by Chinese companies in U.S. markets. The American businesses complained that the large imports of steel resulted in unfair competition since the imports were unfairly low in price.
The ITC investigated the allegations on the recommendation of the Commerce Department to find out if there was injury or threat to injury on the domestic market. The agency found the Chinese companies guilty of dumping steel products, and that it caused material damage to the American businesses. The ITC imposed a 500% import duty on select steel imports from China to protect the domestic steel industry.
Thank you for reading CFI’s guide to Anti-Dumping Duty. To keep learning and advancing your career, the following CFI resources will be helpful:
Take your learning and productivity to the next level with our Premium Templates.
Upgrading to a paid membership gives you access to our extensive collection of plug-and-play Templates designed to power your performance—as well as CFI's full course catalog and accredited Certification Programs.
Already have a Self-Study or Full-Immersion membership? Log in
Access Exclusive Templates
Gain unlimited access to more than 250 productivity Templates, CFI's full course catalog and accredited Certification Programs, hundreds of resources, expert reviews and support, the chance to work with real-world finance and research tools, and more.