What is Activity-Based Costing?
Activity-based costing is a more specific way of allocating overhead costs based on “activities” that actually contribute to overhead costs. In job-order costing and variance analysis, overhead costs are applied based on a specific cost driver such as labor hours or machine hours. An activity is an event, task, or unit of work with a specific purpose, whether it be designing products, setting up machines, operating machines, or distributing products. Therefore, activity-based costing considers all these potential activities instead of relying on just one variable (either labor hours or machine hours).
Labor Hours Approach vs Activity-Based Approach
Let take a look at the following example to compare the differences:
XYZ Company manufactures and sells two types of tables: Standard and Luxury. Annual sales, direct labor hours, and total direct labor hours per year are provided below:
|Standard: 2,000 units * 5 labor hours per unit||10,000|
|Luxury: 10,000 units * 4 labor hours per unit||40,000|
|Total Labor Hours||50,000|
Costs for materials and labor for each table are provided below:
|Direct Labor ($12 per hour)||$60||$48|
Manufacturing overhead costs total $800,000 every year. The breakdown of these costs among the company’s six activity cost pools is given below. The following six activities contribute to overall overhead costs.
|General factory machine hours||$250,000||12,000||28,000||40,000|
Using the predetermined overhead rate approach with labor hours, the predetermined overhead rate is equal to $16 per labor hour ($800,000 / 50,000 labor hours). Using this information, we can design a cost card for each product.
Unit Cost Card Using Labor Approach
Standard Luxury Direct materials $25 $17 Direct labor $60 $48 Manufacturing overhead applied: Standard: 5 labor hours * $16 per labor hour $80 Luxury: 4 labor hours * $16 per labor hour $64 Unit product cost $165 $129
Activity-Based Approach to Determine Overhead
Using the activity-based costing approach, we can determine overhead rates for each activity that is relevant to production. The activities listed below are given in this example but companies usually break down the relevant activities.
|Activity||Estimated MOH||Total per Activity||Overhead Rate|
|Labor related||$80,000||50,000 hours||$1.60 per labor hour|
|Machine setups||$150,000||5,000 setups||$30.00 per setup|
|Parts administration||$160,000||80 parts||$2,000 per part|
|Production orders||$70,000||400 orders||$175 per order|
|Material receipts||$90,000||750 receipts||$120 per receipt|
|General factory machine hours||$250,000||40,000 machine hours||$6.25 per machine hour|
Next, for each product, we can use the calculated overhead rates to determine the overhead numbers:
|Activity||Expected Activity||Overhead applied||Expected Activity||Overhead applied|
|General factory machine hours||12,000||$75,000||28,000||$175,000|
|Units produced||2,000||Units produced||10,000|
|Overhead cost per unit||$158.25||Overhead cost per unit||$48.35|
Under the activity-based approach, the unit cost card gives different unit product costs for each product.
Unit Cost Card Using Activity-Based Approach
|Manufacturing overhead applied:|
|Standard: 5 labor hours * $16 per labor hour||$158.25|
|Luxury: 4 labor hours * $16 per labor hour||$48.35|
|Unit product cost||$243.25||$113.35|
Download the Free Template
Enter your name and email in the form below and download the free template now!
By comparing the first unit cost card (i.e., when manufacturing overhead is applied based on just one variable: direct labor hours) and the second unit cost card (i.e., when manufacturing overhead is applied based on several important activities), we can see that the unit product cost for each product is generally similar. However, the activity-based approach is the more precise and common way that companies will allocate their manufacturing overhead costs.
For the standard product, we can see that the manufacturing overhead cost per unit is too low for the regular labor-based approach. In producing the product, more overhead costs were actually put into the process than estimated by the labor approach. In contrast, for the luxury product, manufacturing overhead costs based on labor hours were too high compared to the activity-based approach. When considering all relevant activities, overhead costs in manufacturing each product are actually less than that estimated by labor hours only.
Therefore, even though labor hours or machine hours may be a good starting point for companies to get a general idea of potential overhead costs, they can use activity-based costing as an alternative if they are looking to get a more exact application of overhead.
Thank you for reading the CFI guide to activity-based costing. To learn more about costing and accounting, see the following resources: