Login to your new FMVA dashboard today.

Negotiated Budgeting

A budgeting process that allows a shared responsibility between the superiors and subordinates

What is Negotiated Budgeting?

Negotiated budgeting is a budgeting process that combines both top-down budgeting and bottom-up budgeting. The negotiated budgeting process does not impose the budget preparation process on a single level, but rather allows shared responsibility between the superiors and subordinates.


Negotiated Budgeting


Unlike top-down budgeting, negotiated budgeting increases the involvement of lower-level managers, which makes it easy to set realistic targets. Employees also demonstrate a more personal interest in the budget preparation, since they feel that their contribution is recognized by the management. The top managers also agree to solicit suggestions from subordinates who are responsible for implementing the budget.


How It Works

Companies follow the process below when preparing negotiated budgets:


1. Superiors set targets

The process starts with the superiors preparing the targets for the next financial period. Usually, the top management uses historical performance data as a benchmark for setting the targets to be achieved. The management is more experienced in setting up the initial targets since they can access important performance information and trends.

Sometimes, the top-level executives may seek suggestions from lower-level managers on the targets for the next financial period. The prepared targets are then passed on to the lower-level managers for consideration.


2. Targets sent to subordinates

The department-level managers receive the targets from the top-level managers and are required to prepare action plans based on the given targets. Unlike top-down budgeting that limits the subordinates’ action plans to the budget allocation, negotiated budgeting gives employees the flexibility to negotiate the projected revenue and costs.

The departmental projections can be higher or lower than the management targets. Such flexibility creates an incentive for employees to make suggestions on what they expect in the next budget.


3. Parties meet to discuss the subordinates’ action plan

After the creation of the action plans, both the superiors and subordinates meet to discuss the budget. The meeting acts as an open forum where subordinates can educate their superiors on the realities of the budget since they are the people tasked with implementing it.

The forum allows each party to present its views and negotiate the differing points until they come to a consensus. The goal is to reduce the difference in the cost estimates presented by each party until they agree on a budget that is acceptable to both sides.

Subordinates are often encouraged by their superior’s positive response in their suggestions, and they may surrender some of their demands to the superior’s advantage. However, the management retains the upper hand in the negotiations, and they can adjust the figures arrived through the bottom-up budgeting process.


4. Budget approval

Once both parties have discussed and made suggestions on the budget, the changes should be incorporated into the budget. Usually, the departmental managers will be required to revise their budgets and projections to reflect what the subordinates and the superiors agreed on.

Once the budget has been finalized, it is presented to the management for approval. The budget is then sent to the finance department for funding, based on the projections agreed upon by the management and the subordinates.


Top-Down Component in Negotiated Budgeting

The management’s role in the negotiated budgeting process is to provide direction to the company. The top managers are more experienced in planning than the subordinates, and are, therefore, best suited to set targets for the company. It takes less time since it does not require multi-level participation. If the employees were asked to prepare targets for the company, the budget preparation would take longer as the employees put forward their suggestions and reach an agreement.

Another advantage of the top-down component is that the subordinates will better understand what the superiors expect in the next financial year. On the downside, the top executives possess limited knowledge of the specific departmental activities and may tend to underestimate the cost requirements.


Bottom-Up Component in Negotiated Budgeting

The bottom-up element of a budget encourages commitment to the plan by involving the people who are responsible for budget preparation. A negotiated budget allows for shared responsibility between the management and the subordinates. It increases employee motivation compared to an imposed budget where employees are limited by the management’s targets.

When employees are allowed to prepare action plans on the revenue and cost projections for the next financial period, they will work together to take their plans to the next level until they reach the highest level for approval. Employees will take a personal interest in the plan. It will help boost their morale at work and motivate them to work hard to achieve the targets that they helped formulate.


Additional Resources

CFI is the official provider of the global Financial Modeling & Valuation Analyst (FMVA)™ certification program, designed to help anyone become a world-class financial analyst. To keep advancing your career, the additional resources below will be useful:

  • Imposed Budgeting
  • Operating Budget
  • Project Finance
  • Types of Budgets

Financial Analyst Training

Get world-class financial training with CFI’s online certified financial analyst training program!

Gain the confidence you need to move up the ladder in a high powered corporate finance career path.


Learn financial modeling and valuation in Excel the easy way, with step-by-step training.