Home Market Effect

A trade theory which argues that countries that exhibit higher demand for some products locally tend to record higher sales of the same products in foreign markets

Over 1.8 million professionals use CFI to learn accounting, financial analysis, modeling and more. Start with a free account to explore 20+ always-free courses and hundreds of finance templates and cheat sheets.

Start Free

Written by CFI Team

What is the Home Market Effect?

The home market effect is a trade theory that argues that countries that exhibit higher demand for some products locally tend to record higher sales of the same products in foreign markets.

Home Market Effect

The home market effect hypothesis was first hypothesized by Stephan Linda (1961) and later formalized by Paul Krugman (1980). From a policy standpoint, the home market effect implies that the protection of imports may promote exports, an analogy often more popular among communities than among economists.

The home market effect shows a relationship between a country’s market size and industrial specialization and is considered a central tenet of the New Trade Theory.

Summary

The home market effect is an international trade hypothesis that looks at the causal effect of the cross-country differences in demand.
It overcomes the challenge of explaining the relationship between a country’s exports and market size, as seen in comparative advantage models.
The majority of empirical studies that used real-world data to test the home market effect confirm the hypothesis that higher demand for a specific product at home tends to increase the sales of the same product abroad and that this effect can make that country a net seller of the product.

Understanding the Home Market Effect

The home market effect described the large country’s habit of specializing in sectors with high economies of scale and shows a proportional relationship between a country’s share of world products and its share of world demand for the same products. It describes the tendency for large countries to focus on exporting products bearing high trade costs in terms of economies of scale and transport costs.

The hypothesis further suggests that it is economically prudent to concentrate the production of a single line of products in a single geographical zone in the presence of fixed costs. The logic behind such an approach is that increasing production would yield economies of scale.

At the same time, it is economically viable to establish production in an area that exhibits high sales of the product in the presence of transport costs.

The home market effect considers larger or richer countries as the monopolies of large production bases because of (1) higher demand for the product; and (2) higher gross domestic product. The pattern is based on the market effect of high-population or rich countries.

Implications of the Home Market Effect Model

The home market effect describes the relationship between exports and market size. Typical comparative advantage trade models can hardly explain such a relationship. The home market theory also elucidates the concept behind the accumulation of manufacturing activity at specific zones, even within countries.

Under the assumptions of the presence of economies of scale and transport costs, the model implies that trade surplus abounds for countries with a large demand for a particular product.

It also means that larger countries with a high demand for quality products tend to specialize in such product lines and eventually trade more with rich countries.

Another implication of the models is that smaller countries will end up producing products with low economies of scale and low transport costs since other trade factors are offset by low wages.

Validity of the Home Market Effect

An overwhelming number of empirical studies on the theoretical framework demonstrate the causal effect of cross-country differences in demand. Previous international trade theories were criticized because most products exported by capital-rich countries were labor-intensive.

Such aspersions on the comparative advantage of labor and capital led to the home market effect model. Subsequent studies that followed Krugman’s idea used real-world data to test the validity of the model. Against such a backdrop, the home market effect’s been confirmed as an occurring phenomenon whose market effects are based on transport costs and the direction of returns to scale.

For example, the pharmaceutical sector can be shown to experience a robust home-market effect. A rich country whose population is likely to succumb to a particular illness is also expected to demand pharmaceutical products that target the disease.

The elasticity of a country’s foreign sales of the pharmaceuticals can be significant enough to convert countries with greater demand for the same medications into net sellers.

It shows that the sector-level economies of scale substantially drive the demand elasticity, as opposed to a low elasticity of demand. Other industries with high transport costs and large substitution elasticity include leather, textile, and food products.

Impacts of the Home Market Effect for Business

The home market effects point that geographical locations with the large local demand for certain products can produce products with high economies of scale. Managers should keep abreast of the observation and consider it when locating production facilities.

The benefits that come with being close to broader domestic markets with high demand may guarantee to exceed other benefits associated with a location. The home market effect may also help investors effectively make future and current plans of a business’ location.

More Resources

CFI is the official provider of the global Commercial Banking & Credit Analyst (CBCA)™ certification program, designed to help anyone become a world-class financial analyst. To keep advancing your career, the additional CFI resources below will be useful: