What is Audit Fraud?
In addition to their primary role, an auditor is required to consider the potential for audit fraud, in accordance with the respective auditing standards of different countries around the world.
The primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud rests with those charged with the governance of the entity (i.e., the Board of Directors) and management (the client). It is mainly management’s role to place a strong emphasis on fraud prevention, which can severely reduce opportunities for corporate misdeeds.
An auditor’s role is to conduct an audit in such a manner as to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements, taken as a whole, are free from material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error. The distinction between fraud and error is a matter of intent. Intentional errors are considered fraud and unintentional errors are simply errors.
Two Types of Audit Fraud
|Fraudulent Financial Reporting||Misappropriation of Assets|
|Usually perpetrated by senior management (CEO, CFO, COO)||Usually perpetrated by lower level employees|
|Committed by the organization||Committed against the organization|
|Benefits the organization/company||Benefits the individual/employee|
|Auditor are highly concerned about this||Rarely material and less of a concern for an auditor|
The Audit Fraud Triangle
The fraud triangle refers to conditions that are generally present when material misstatements due to fraud occur.
- Generally, refers to companies undergoing excessive pressure to meet analysts’ or investors’ expectations
- Stock options and bonuses based on net income are examples of such incentives and/or pressures
Opportunities for Fraud
- Ineffective governance – for example, the Board of Directors is not committed to ethical policies and morals
- Significant judgment/estimates are involved in accounting
Potential Problems arising from Attitudes/Rationalization
- Management is very aggressive, has a risk-taking mentality, and makes highly unrealistic forecasts that need to be met
- The ethical tone at the top is poor, which allows perpetrators to rationalize their actions
The Auditor’s Role
When the auditor is considering the potential for fraud in an audit, they will focus on risk assessment procedures in the planning stage. Remember that auditors must maintain an attitude of professional skepticism. One of the auditor’s responsibilities include asking management and the audit committee if they know of any unusual situation or any employee who is acting strangely, because the prevention and detection of fraud is ultimately their responsibility.
Fraud isn’t just about catching unusual transactions and relationships in the numbers in the books but also about examining the general behavioral patterns of employees and any hardships, financial or otherwise, that they may be suffering at the time.
In addition, the auditor will consider the fraud triangle and look for any fraud risk factors (red flags) that indicate an incentive/pressure to commit fraud. Finally, in the planning stage, auditors will also carry out ratio and trend analyses to look for any unusual patterns or unexpected results in relation to previous year/industry data.
The Auditor’s Responses to Audit Fraud Risks
An auditor’s action in response to potential fraud can be divided into an overall (i.e., financial statement level) and then a more specific (specific line item/assertion level) response.
In dealing with significant fraud risks at the overall level, the accounting firm will assign more experienced audit staff to the engagement and increase the level of supervision of lower level staff. The auditor will also thoroughly consider the client’s accounting choices and policies to determine acceptability. Finally, auditors may choose to implement unpredictable, surprise procedures to verify the values on the financial statements – such as unexpectedly showing up at the client’s inventory count unannounced.
On a more specific level, auditors will make an effort to gain more reliable evidence by relying more on documentary evidence as opposed to oral or visual evidence. In addition, they may also try to obtain more evidence from third parties instead of just from the client. They may also change the extent of their procedures by increasing their sample size to substantiate values, as well as by performing procedures closer to year end (varying the timing of the audit procedure).
We can see why the planning stage of an audit is very important. Depending on the client, the client’s inherent risk level, and the audit risk level that auditors are willing to tolerate, the scope of audit work can differ substantially. With effective planning, proper implementation, and a skeptical attitude, auditors should be able to uncover most frauds that take place.
Thank you for reading CFI’s guide to audit fraud. CFI offers the global Certified Financial Analyst program for anyone looking to become a world-class analyst. To learn more, see the following resources.